Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nova Chemicals Corporation v. Dow Chemical Company, No. 15-1257 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1257
Decided
June 9, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION (CANADA),

NOVA CHEMICALS INC. (DELAWARE),

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1257

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-01601-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

DONALD ROBERT DUNNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by MARK J. FELDSTEIN, DARREL CHRISTOPHER KARL.

HARRY J. ROPER, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by AARON A. BARLOW, PAUL DAVID MARGOLIS, ANTON R. VALUKAS; WILLIAM ADAMS, RAYMOND N. NIMROD,

2KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN, CLELAND B. WELTON, II, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nova Chemicals Corporation v. Dow Chemical Company, No. 15-1257 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01257-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01257-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error