Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Inventio AG v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator, No. 15-1189 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1189
Also Docketed
No. 15-1227 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
November 12, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INVENTIO AG,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AMERICAS

CORPORATION, THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR

MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED,

Defendants

2015-1189, 2015-1227

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:08-cv-00874-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

PIERRE YANNEY, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

DAVID E. SCHMIT, Frost Brown Todd LLC, Cincinnati, OH, argued for defendant-cross-appellant.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Inventio AG v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator, No. 15-1189 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 12, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01189-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01189-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error