Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Amdocs (Israel) Limited v. Openet Telecom, Inc., No. 15-1180 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2016)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1180
Decided
November 1, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT ACCOMPANIED BY OPINION

OPINION FILED AND JUDGMENT ENTERED: 11/01/2016

The attached opinion announcing the judgment of the court in your case was filed and judgment was entered on the date indicated above. The mandate will be issued in due course. Information is also provided about petitions for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc. The questions and answers are those frequently asked and answered by the Clerk's Office. No costs were taxed in this appeal. Regarding exhibits and visual aids: Your attention is directed Fed. R. App. P. 34(g) which states that the clerk may destroy or dispose of the exhibits if counsel does not reclaim them within a reasonable time after the clerk gives notice to remove them. (The clerk deems a reasonable time to be 15 days from the date the final mandate is issued.)

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

15-1180 - Amdocs (Israel) Limited v. Openet Telecom, Inc. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Case No. 1:10-cv-00910-LMB-TRJ

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Amdocs (Israel) Limited v. Openet Telecom, Inc., No. 15-1180 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01180-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01180-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.