Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Componex Corporation v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., No. 15-1178 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1178
Decided
October 16, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

COMPONEX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1178

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in No. 3:13-cv-00384-wmc, Judge William M. Conley.

JUDGMENT

HARRY E. VAN CAMP, DeWitt Ross & Stevens S.C., Madison, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH T. LEONE.

MICHAEL JOHN VON LOEWENFELDT, Kerr & Wagstaffe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN CLUNE, IVO LABAR. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Componex Corporation v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., No. 15-1178 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01178-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01178-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error