Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Resh v. Hetzner, No. 15-1158 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1158
Decided
July 9, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ERIC RESH,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RON HETZNER, JESS HETZNER, OREQ CORP,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1158

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 5:13-cv-00830-JGBSP, Judge Jesus G. Bernal.

JUDGMENT

JOHN MARK HOLLAND, J. Mark Holland & Associates, Irvine, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ALTON G. BURKHALTER, CARMEN MARIA MIRANDA, Burkhalter Kessler Goodman & George LLP, Irvine, CA. JOSHUA STOWELL, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN B. SGANGA, JR.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Resh v. Hetzner, No. 15-1158 (Fed. Cir. July 9, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01158-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01158-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.