Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Florida atlantic University v. Asus Computer International, No. 15-1125 (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1125
Also Docketed
No. 15-1126, No. 15-1127 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 17, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY RESEARCH

CORPORATION, DOMAINE ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ASUSTEK

COMPUTER INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

TPV TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, TOP VICTORY

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, TOP VICTORY

ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TOP VICTORY

ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV

ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV

INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION

PERIPHERALS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

AOC INTERNATIONAL,

Defendant

2015-1125, -1126, -1127

2Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 9:12-cv-80694-PAS, 9:12-cv-80697-PAS, 9:12-cv-80701-PAS, Judge Patricia A. Seitz.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY N. STILLMAN, Hunton & Williams LLP, Norfolk, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by OZZIE FARRES, MICHAEL ALFRED O’SHEA, Washington, DC.

JONATHAN HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees TPV Technology Limited, Top Victory International Limited, et al., also represented by MARK A. SAMUELS, BRIAN BERLINER, VISION WINTER, Los Angeles, CA.

JOSHUA M. MASUR, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City, CA, for defendants-appellees Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc. Also represented by ZHUANJIA GU.

CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, for defendants-appellees Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL CHAOCHA TING.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

3PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Florida atlantic University v. Asus Computer International, No. 15-1125 (Fed. Cir. July 17, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01125-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01125-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error