Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Summit Data Systems LLC v. NetApp Inc., No. 15-1103 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1103
Decided
October 9, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SUMMIT DATA SYSTEMS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NETAPP INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1103

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:10-cv-00749-GMS, Judge Gregory M. Sleet.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by TRAVIS CAMPBELL.

EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BYRON BEEBE; DOUGLAS B. LUFTMAN, NetApp, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA.

2NATALIE HANLON-LEH, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, Denver, CO, for amicus curiae Comcast Cable Communications, LLC. Also represented by MARY VIRGINIA SOOTER.

STEVEN MOORE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA, for amici curiae Askeladden, LLC, Dell Inc., et al.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Summit Data Systems LLC v. NetApp Inc., No. 15-1103 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01103-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01103-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.