Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Argentum Medical, LLC v. Noble Biomaterials, No. 15-1057 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1057
Decided
July 15, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ARGENTUM MEDICAL, LLC,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant

GREGG SILVER, THOMAS MILLER,

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants

v.

NOBLE BIOMATERIALS,

Defendant/Counterclaimant DERMA SCIENCES, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant

NOBLE FIBER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Third Party Defendant

2015-1057

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 3:08-cv-01305-ARC, Senior Judge A. Richard Caputo.

JUDGMENT

2THOMAS C. CRONIN, Cronin & Co., Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for counterclaim defendants-appellants. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Argentum Medical, LLC v. Noble Biomaterials, No. 15-1057 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01057-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01057-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.