Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc., No. 15-1056 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1056
Decided
July 15, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,

Plaintiff

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

v.

DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON,

Sanctioned Parties-Appellants

2015-1056

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:02-cv-60478-WJZ, Judge William J. Zloch.

JUDGMENT

DAVID FINK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for appellants. TIMOTHY J. ROUSSEAU, Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by

2DOUGLAS J. KLINE, Boston, MA; WILLIAM M. JAY, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Inc., No. 15-1056 (Fed. Cir. July 15, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01056-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01056-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error