NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
ALEXANDER SHUKH,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, SEAGATE
TECHNOLOGY, INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY,
Defendants-Appellees
UNKNOWN OWNERS AND ASSIGNEES,
Defendant
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC,
Defendant-Appellee
2015-1012
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:10-cv-00404-JRT-JJK, Judge John R. Tunheim.
Decided: October 2, 2015
CONSTANTINE JOHN GEKAS, Gekas Law Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
22 SHUKH v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC
CHAD DROWN, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by DAVID J.F. GROSS, CHARLES FEENEY KNAPP, ELIZABETH COWAN WRIGHT, AARON D. VAN OORT; CALVIN L. LITSEY, East Palo Alto, CA.
Before MOORE, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges.
In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court’s judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court’s costs judgment.
VACATED AND REMANDED
COSTS
No costs.