Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Astornet Technologies Inc. v. BAE Systems, Inc., No. 14-1854 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2015)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1854
Also Docketed
No. 15-1006, No. 15-1007 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 17, 2015
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

September 18, 2015

ERRATUM

Appeal Nos. 2014-1854, 2015-1006, 2015-1007

ASTORNET TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BAE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

MORPHOTRUST USA, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

NCR GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

Decided: September 17, 2015

Precedential Opinion

The following change has been made in the first line of the opinion: insert “the” before “sole.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Astornet Technologies Inc. v. BAE Systems, Inc., No. 14-1854 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01854-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01854-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.