Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cot'N Wash Inc. v. Sun Products Corporation, No. 14-1805 (Fed. Cir. June 4, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1805
Decided
June 4, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit COT'N WASH INC., BIG 3 PACKAGING LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

SUN PRODUCTS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2014-1805

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00651-SLR, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

STEVEN MOLO, MoloLamken LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by BENOIT QUARMBY; ERIC RICHARD NITZ, ROBERT KELSEY KRY, Washington, DC.

ERROL TAYLOR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by FREDRICK ZULLOW, ANNA BROOK.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 4, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cot'N Wash Inc. v. Sun Products Corporation, No. 14-1805 (Fed. Cir. June 4, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01805-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01805-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error