Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Meyer Intellectual Properties v. Bodum, Inc., No. 14-1792 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1792
Decided
May 15, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MEYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED,

MEYER CORPORATION, U.S.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

BODUM, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2014-1792

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:06-cv-06329, Senior Judge Harry D. Leinenweber.

JUDGMENT

R. DAVID DONOGHUE, Holland & Knight, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by STEVEN E. JEDLINSKI; JOSHUA C. KRUMHOLZ, Boston, MA.

DAVID E. BENNETT, I, Vedder Price P.C., Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by ROBERT STEPHEN RIGG.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Meyer Intellectual Properties v. Bodum, Inc., No. 14-1792 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01792-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01792-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error