Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd., No. 14-1766 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1766
Decided
September 15, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

OBAYASHI SEIKOU CO., LTD., NAOTO HIROTA,

SAKAE TANAKA,

Defendants-Appellees

2014-1766

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 1:11-cv-01637-RC, Judge Rudolph Contreras.

JUDGMENT

ANDREW JOHN PINCUS, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JAMIE B. BEABER, PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, KFIR LEVY, TIFFANY A. MILLER.

ANDREW GEORGE, Baker Botts, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by MICHAEL JOSEPH BARTA, RYAN EDWARD BULL, JAMIE ROY LYNN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd., No. 14-1766 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01766-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01766-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.