Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Emblaze Ltd. v. apple Inc., No. 14-1734 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1734
Also Docketed
No. 15-1400, No. 15-1557 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 4, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EMBLAZE LTD.,

NOW KNOWN AS B.S.D. CROWN LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

2014-1734, 2015-1400, 2015-1557

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal.

JUDGMENT

MARTIN B. PAVANE, Cozen O’Connor, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LISA A. FERRARI.

JOHN ALLCOCK, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by ERIN GIBSON, STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI III; MARK D. FOWLER, East Palo Alto, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 4, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Emblaze Ltd. v. apple Inc., No. 14-1734 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01734-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01734-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.