Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ergowerx International LLC v. Maxell Corporation of america, No. 14-1641 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1641
Decided
September 11, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ERGOWERX INTERNATIONAL LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MAXELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee

2014-1641

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:13-cv-05633-PAE, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

JUDGMENT

JAY P. NELKIN, Nelkin & Nelkin, P.C., Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

HILARY L. PRESTON, Vinson & Elkins LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by AJEET P. PAI, Austin, TX; NICKOU OSKOUI, Dallas, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 11, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ergowerx International LLC v. Maxell Corporation of america, No. 14-1641 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01641-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01641-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error