Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., No. 14-1633 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1633
Also Docketed
No. 14-1643, No. 14-1670 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 10, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2014-1633, 2014-1643, 2014-1670

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 3:02-cv-00134-ARC, Senior Judge A. Richard Caputo.

JUDGMENT

KATHRYN CLUNE, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by JACOB ZIEMOWIT ZAMBRZYCKI, San Francisco, CA; CARTER GLASGOW PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC; ERIC SHUMSKY, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC.

ALAN MARSHALL ANDERSON, Alan Anderson Law Firm LLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendant-appellant.

2Also represented by AARON C. NYQUIST, MATTHEW ROBERT PALEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., No. 14-1633 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01633-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01633-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error