Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Bravo Media LLC, No. 14-1631 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1631
Decided
April 8, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DIETGOAL INNOVATIONS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BRAVO MEDIA LLC, (DIVISION OF NBC

UNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC),

Defendant-Appellee

2014-1631

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:13-cv-08391-PAE, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

JUDGMENT

ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

J. CHRISTOPHER CARRAWAY, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by NORMAN ANDREW SFEIR.

VERA RANIERI, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA, for amici curiae Application Developers

2Alliance, et al. Also represented by DANIEL K. NAZER; CHARLES DUAN, Public Knowledge, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

DietGoal Innovations LLC v. Bravo Media LLC, No. 14-1631 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01631-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01631-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error