Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership, No. 14-1587 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2015) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MAYFAIR WIRELESS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, VERIZON WIRELESS,

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

2014-1587

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-00772-GMS-SRF, Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL AARON KOTCHEN, Kotchen & Low LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JOHN VON KLEMPERER.

JOHNATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellees. Defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless, also represented by GEOFFREY P. EATON, ANDREW RYAN

2SOMMER, CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III, ERIC M. GOLDSTEIN, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC. Defendant-appellee AT&T Mobility LLC, also represented by JOSEPH P. ZAMMIT, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, New York, NY; RICHARD STEPHEN ZEMBEK, DANIEL LEVENTHAL, Norton Rose Fulbright, Houston, TX; SHEILA KADURA, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, Austin, TX. Defendant-appellee T-Mobile USA, Inc., also represented by SHANNON JOST, Stokes Lawrence, P.S., Seattle WA; JOHN W. SHAW, Shaw Keller, Wilmington, DE. Defendant-appellee Sprint Nextel Corporation, also represented by KAREN ANN JACOBS, JENNIFER YING, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP. Wilmington, DE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Cite this opinion