Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hypoxico Inc. v. Colorado altitude Training, No. 14-1544 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1544
Decided
June 18, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HYPOXICO INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

COLORADO ALTITUDE TRAINING LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2014-1544

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:02-cv-06191-TPG, Senior Judge Thomas P. Griesa.

JUDGMENT

ROGER THOMPSON, The Law Offices of Roger S. Thompson, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

CHARLES DAVISON HOFFMANN, Hoffmann Marshall Strong LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW STRONG.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hypoxico Inc. v. Colorado altitude Training, No. 14-1544 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01544-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01544-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.