Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 14-1496 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1496
Decided
March 6, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., HTC AMERICA INC,

UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION,

SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., MOTOROLA

SOLUTIONS, INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2014-1496

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:12-cv-01011-JST, Judge Jon S. Tigar.

JUDGMENT

TERESA M. SUMMERS, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOHN L. HENDRICKS, DANIEL ROBINSON SCARDINO, JOHN MATTHEW MURRELL, Reed & Scardino LLP, Austin, TX.

2L. NORWOOD JAMESON, Duane Morris LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellees. Defendant-appellee Cisco Systems, Inc., also represented by ALISON HADDOCK HUTTON, MATTHEW YUNGWIRTH, JOHN R. GIBSON; JOSEPH POWERS, Philadelphia, PA. Defendant-appellee HTC America Inc, also represented by FRED I. WILLIAMS, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Austin, TX; ERIC JOSEPH KLEIN, TODD ERIC LANDIS, Dallas, TX. Defendant-appellee United States Cellular Corporation, also represented by RICHARD JOHN O’BRIEN, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; BRYAN K. ANDERSON, ASHISH NAGDEV, Sidley Austin LLP, Palo Alto, CA; RYAN C. MORRIS, Washington, DC. Defendant-appellee Sprint Spectrum, L.P., also represented by JOHN J. COTTER, VENKATA RAMAN BHARATULA, K&L Gates LLP, Boston, MA. Defendant-appellees Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, also represented by STEVEN MOORE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; CARL ELLIOTT SANDERS, Winston-Salem, NC; FREDERICK LEE WHITMER, New York, NY; CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

∗ and FOGEL, District Judge ).

3AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 6, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. ∗ Honorable Jeremy Fogel, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and Director of the Federal Judicial Center, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 14-1496 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01496-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01496-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.