Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd, No. 14-1492 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2015)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1492
Decided
August 4, 2015
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

August 6, 2015

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2014-1492

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY,

v.

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., MARVELL

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

Decided: August 4, 2015

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: On page twenty-nine, first paragraph under heading C, replace the sentence

And it argues that award improperly includes “foreign chips in the royalty base.”

with the following sentence:

And it argues that the award improperly includes “foreign chips in the royalty base.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd, No. 14-1492 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01492-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01492-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.