Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Sigmapharm Labs, No. 14-1456 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1456
Decided
December 8, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

2014-1456

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 2:10-cv-04931-SDW-MCA, Judge Susan D. Wigenton.

JUDGMENT

TIMOTHY J. KELLY, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was CHRISTOPHER E. LOH. Of counsel was COLLEEN TRACY.

JOHN E. ROSENQUIST, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, LTD., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was MARC R. WEZOWSKI. Of counsel on the brief were K. LEE MARSHALL and ROBERT L. STOLEBARGER, Bryan Cave LLP, of San Francisco, Cali-

2fornia; and AMEER GADO and ANTHONY FRIEDMAN, of St. Louis, Missouri. Of counsel was KAREN A. CONFOY, Fox Rothschild, of Lawrenceville, New Jersey.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Sigmapharm Labs, No. 14-1456 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01456-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01456-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.