Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Dey LP v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc., No. 14-1434 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1434
Decided
April 17, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DEY LP, NKA MYLAN SPECIALTY, L.P., DEY INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC., TEVA

PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA

PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellants

2014-1434

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia in No. 1:09-cv-00087-IMK, Judge Irene M. Keeley.

JUDGMENT

EVAN CHESLER, Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DAVID GREENWALD, DAVID R. MARRIOTT, ROGER BROOKS.

BRUCE M. GAGALA, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented

2by DAVID RYAN VAN BUSKIRK, JEFFREY B. BURGAN; ELIZABETH CROMPTON, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Dey LP v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc., No. 14-1434 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01434-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01434-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error