Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Invista North america v. M&G Polymers USA, No. 14-1432 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1432
Decided
August 13, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INVISTA NORTH AMERICA S.A.R.L.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

AND

AURIGA POLYMERS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

M&G POLYMERS USA LLC AND

M&G USA CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellants.

2014-1432

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-01007-SLR-CJB, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

MEGAN D. DORTENZO, Thompson Hine LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was ARTHUR P. LICYGIEWICZ. Of counsel on the brief were WILLIAM P. ATKINS and CHRISTOPHER K.

2DORSEY, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia.

WILLIAM J. MARSDEN, JR., Fish & Richardson P.C., of Wilmington, Delaware, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief for INVISTA North America S.a.r.l. were DOUGLAS E. MCCANN, MARTINA TYREUS HUFNAL, ROBERT M. OAKES, and MICHELLE NEROZZI-ANKENBRAND. On the brief for Auriga Polymers Inc. were JOHN W. SHAW and JEFFREY T. CASTELLANO, Shaw Keller LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Invista North america v. M&G Polymers USA, No. 14-1432 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01432-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01432-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.