Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Digital ally, Inc. v. Utility associates, Inc., No. 14-1420 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1420
Decided
February 10, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit DIGITAL ALLY, INC., a Nevada corporation,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corpora-

tion,

Defendant-Appellee

2014-1420

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:13-cv-02550-SAC-KGS, Senior Judge Sam A. Crow.

JUDGMENT

ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

DAVID S. MORELAND, Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by NATHAN SLOAN, STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Digital ally, Inc. v. Utility associates, Inc., No. 14-1420 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01420-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01420-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error