Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Medtrica Solutions Ltd. v. Cygnus Medical, LLC, No. 14-1400 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1400
Decided
March 6, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MEDTRICA SOLUTIONS LTD.,

A CANADA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CYGNUS MEDICAL, LLC,

A CONNECTICUT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant

v.

STERIS CORPORATION,

AN OHIO CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2014-1400

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:12-cv-00538-RSL, Judge Robert S. Lasnik.

JUDGMENT

ROD STEVEN BERMAN, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee,

2defendant-appellee. Also represented by JESSICA BROMALL SPARKMAN for plaintiff-appelle; MICHAEL JOHN ESTOK, Lindsay Hart, LLP, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee.

BENJAMIN J. LEHBERGER, St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens, LLC, Stamford, CT, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by WESLEY W. WHITMYER, STEPHEN BALL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 6, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Medtrica Solutions Ltd. v. Cygnus Medical, LLC, No. 14-1400 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01400-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01400-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.