Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

E-Lynxx Corporation v. InnerWorkings, Inc., No. 14-1349 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1349
Decided
February 9, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

E-LYNXX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INNERWORKINGS, INC., CIRQIT.COM, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2014-1349

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in No. 1:10-cv-02535-CCC, Chief Judge Christopher Conner.

JUDGMENT

DARREN PATRICK NICHOLSON, Sayles Werbner, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARK STRACHAN; JONATHAN TAD SUDER, BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX.

DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee InnerWorkings, Inc. Also represented by ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC;

2JENNIFER H. DOAN, JOSHUA R. THANE, Haltom & Doan, Texarkana, TX.

JENNIFER E. HOEKEL, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for defendant-appellee Cirqit.com, Inc. Also represented by JESSICA MENDEZ, RICHARD L. BROPHY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

E-Lynxx Corporation v. InnerWorkings, Inc., No. 14-1349 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01349-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01349-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error