Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Pure Fishing, Inc. v. Normark Corporation, No. 14-1300 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1300
Also Docketed
No. 15-1167, No. 15-1168 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
October 16, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PURE FISHING, INC., AN IOWA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

NORMARK CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA

CORPORATION, DBA RAPALA,

Defendant-Appellant

2014-1300, 2015-1167, 2015-1168

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in No. 3:10-cv-02140-CMC, Judge Cameron McGowan Currie.

JUDGMENT

MARCUS ANGELO MANOS, Nexsen Pruet PLLC, Columbia, SC, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by DANIEL CHARLES LEONARDI.

JOHN THOMAS VITT, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by SHANNON L. BJORKLUND, MICHAEL WEINBECK; ALAN RANDOLPH MARSHALL, Dority & Manning, P.A., Greenville, SC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Pure Fishing, Inc. v. Normark Corporation, No. 14-1300 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01300-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01300-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error