Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kramer v. Creative Compounds, LLC, No. 14-1284 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1284
Decided
October 15, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit RON KRAMER, SAL ABRAHAM, AND

THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CREATIVE COMPOUNDS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CREATIVE COMPOUNDS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RON KRAMER AND SAL ABRAHAM,

Defendants-Appellees.

2014-1284

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in Nos. 2:11-cv-01965-JAT and 2:11-cv-02033-JAT, Judge James A. Teilborg.

JUDGMENT

2NELSON D. NOLTE, of Manchester, Missouri, argued for Creative Compounds, LLC.

GEOFFREY S. KERCSMAR, Kercsmar & Feltus, PLLC, of Scottsdale, Arizona, argued for Ron Kramer, et al. With him on the brief was GREGORY B. COLLINS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kramer v. Creative Compounds, LLC, No. 14-1284 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01284-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01284-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.