Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alcohol Monitoring Systems v. BI Incorporated, No. 14-1266 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1266
Decided
July 13, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BI INCORPORATED, GEO CARE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2014-1266

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 1:11-cv-00301-DME-CBS, Senior Judge David M. Ebel.

JUDGMENT

JON TREMBATH, Lathrop & Gage LLP, Denver, CO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PHILLIP S. LORENZO, JAMES ESPY DALLNER, ALEXANDER C. CLAYDEN, ALLISON STEINCIPHER WALLIN.

TIMOTHY P. GETZOFF, Holland & Hart LLP, Boulder, CO, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by MICHAEL P. MANNING, Holland & Hart LLP, Billings, MT.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 13, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alcohol Monitoring Systems v. BI Incorporated, No. 14-1266 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01266-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01266-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.