Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Tse v. Blockbuster, Inc., No. 14-1223 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2014)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1223
Decided
July 16, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HO KEUNG TSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1223

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 13-cv-01204, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

HO KEUNG, TSE, of Cheung Sha Wan, Hong Kong, pro se.

SCOTT LLEWELLYN, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Denver, Colorado, for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tse v. Blockbuster, Inc., No. 14-1223 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01223-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01223-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error