Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Tse v. Google Inc., No. 14-1222 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2014)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1222
Decided
July 16, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HO KEUNG TSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA LLC,

HTC AMERICA, INC., AND BLOCKBUSTER, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2014-1222

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 13-cv-00194, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

HO KEUNG, TSE, of Cheung Sha, Hong Kong, pro se. STEPHANIE P. SKAFF, Farella Braun + Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, for Google, Inc. With her on the brief were DEEPAK GUPTA; BIJAL VAKIL and ERIC KRAUSE, White & Case LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; JERRY R. SELINGER, Patterson & Sheridan, LLP, of Dallas, Texas

2for HTC America, Inc.; and SCOTT LLEWELLYN, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Denver, Colorado, for Blockbuster, LLC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tse v. Google Inc., No. 14-1222 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01222-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01222-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error