Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Clerisy Corporation v. airware Holdings Incorporated, No. 14-1211 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2014)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1211
Decided
September 16, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CLERISY CORPORATION AND REED TRANSITION

TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

AIRWARE HOLDINGS INCORPORATED (doing business as Airware Labs) AND CROWN DYNAMICS

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellants.

2014-1211

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 2:12-cv-02110-PGR, Senior Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt.

JUDGMENT

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT and MICHELLE E. DAWSON.

JEREMY P. OCZEK, Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC, of Buffalo, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With

2him on the brief were FREDERICK J.M. PRICE and KATE I. REID, of Syracuse, New York. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 16, 2014 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Clerisy Corporation v. airware Holdings Incorporated, No. 14-1211 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01211-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01211-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error