Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers, No. 14-1171 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1171
Decided
August 7, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC., AND

INDIANA FORGE, LLC,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,

AND

WILLIAM L. KOSS,

Counterclaim Defendant,

v.

MILLER VENEERS, INC., THOMAS A. MILLER,

BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO,

ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER

WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND

MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC.,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees.

2014-1171

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in No. 1:09-cv-00702-JMSDML, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.

JUDGMENT

2PAUL B. OVERHAUSER, Overhauser Law Offices, LLC, of Greenfield, Indiana, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants.

MICHAEL A. SWIFT, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were J. LEE MCNEELY, CYNTHIA A. BEDRICK, and CHARLES B. DAUGHERTY, McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Harrold, of Shelbyville, Indiana.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 7, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers, No. 14-1171 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01171-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01171-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.