Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

MasterObjects, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 14-1148 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1148
Decided
November 10, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MASTEROBJECTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1148

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-01054-PJH, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton.

JUDGMENT

SPENCER HOSIE, Hosie Rice LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DIANE SUE RICE and GEORGE F. BISHOP. Of counsel on the brief were LESLIE V. PAYNE, NATHAN J. DAVIS and ALDEN G. HARRIS, Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP, of Houston, Texas.

DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, of Phoenix, Arizona, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel on the brief were JEFFREY J. TONEY, JONATHAN K. WALDROP and

2DARCY L. JONES, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia; and STEVEN C. CARLSON and ROBERT P. WATKINS, III, of Redwood Shores, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MasterObjects, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 14-1148 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01148-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01148-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.