Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up art Cosmetics, Inc., No. 14-1143 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2014)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1143
Decided
August 13, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

Z PRODUX, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MAKE-UP ART COSMETICS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1143

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:13-cv-00734-DDPRZ, Judge Dean D. Pregerson.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT D. KATZ, Katz PLLC, of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

THOMAS C. MAHLUM, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were JAN M. CONLIN, LARINA A. ALTON, and DAVID MARTINEZ. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up art Cosmetics, Inc., No. 14-1143 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01143-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01143-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error