Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Benefit Funding Systems v. advance america Cash, No. 14-1122 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2014)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1122
Also Docketed
No. 14-1124, No. 14-1125 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 25, 2014
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

September 29, 2014

ERRATA

Appeal Nos. 2014-1122, -1124, -1125 BENEFIT FUNDING SYSTEMS LLC

v.

ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS

INC.

Decided: September 25, 2014

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes: Page 8, lines 20–24, change “35 U.S.C. § 325(e)(2)” to --AIA § 18(a)(1)(D)-- and change the quoted text to read --(“The petitioner . . . may not assert . . . in a civil action . . . that the claim is invalid on any ground that the petitioner raised during that transitional proceeding.”)--.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Benefit Funding Systems v. advance america Cash, No. 14-1122 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 25, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01122-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01122-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.