Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kim Laube & Company, Inc. v. Wahl Clipper Corporation, No. 14-1111 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1111
Decided
February 10, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KIM LAUBE & COMPANY, INC.,

a California Corporation,

KIM LAUBE, an individual,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

WAHL CLIPPER CORPORATION,

an Illinois Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee

DOES 1-10, 1 to 10, Inclusive,

Defendants

2014-1111, -1457

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:09-cv-00914-JAKJC, Judge John A. Kronstadt.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS PETER PAVELKO, Novak Druce + Quigg LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by HENRY A. PETRI, JR., DANIEL PATRICK MULLARKEY.

2MARK A. HAGEDORN, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOAN LOUISE LONG.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kim Laube & Company, Inc. v. Wahl Clipper Corporation, No. 14-1111 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01111-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01111-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error