United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
March 9, 2015
ERRATA
Appeal No. 2014-1110
IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA
PATENT LITIGATION
PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,
v.
FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH
AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as
Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON
CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP.,
OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC
CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita
Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG
OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
TECHWIN CO., VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN,
LTD.,
Decided: February 2, 2015
Precedential Opinion
22 PAPST LICENSING V. FUJIFILM CORPORATION
Please make the following change:
On page nine, first paragraph, replace the sentence Second, it is undisputed that if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, the summary-judgment orders must be vacated.2
with the following sentence: Second, it is appropriate, if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, to vacate the summary-judgment orders and remand.2
Footnote 2 remains unchanged.