Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Systems, Inc., No. 14-1078 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2014)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PHIL-INSUL CORP.,

doing business as IntegraSpec,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

REWARD WALL SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

NUDURA CORPORATION AND

POLYFORM A.G.P INC.,

Defendants-Cross-Appellants,

AND

BUILDBLOCK BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

AMVIC CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1078, -1098

2Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in No. 8:12-CV-00091, Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon.

JUDGMENT

PAUL ADAMS, The Adams Law Firm, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL T. COOKE and BRETT M. PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas.

RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-cross-appellants Nudura Corporation, et al. With her on the brief were CHRISTOPHER J. SORENSON, AARON M. JOHNSON, and KATHERINE E. MULLER.

KORI ANNE BAGROWSKI, Brinks Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Amvic Corporation. With her on the brief was JAMES ROBERT SOBIERAJ.

MICHAEL R. ANNIS, Husch Blackwell, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, for defendant-appellee Reward Wall Systems, Inc. Of counsel was ANDREW RICHARD GILFOIL. On the brief for defendant-appellee Buildblock Building Systems, LLC, were DAVID M. SULLIVAN and HARVEY D. ELLIS, JR, Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Of counsel was TYNIA A. WATSON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: