Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Modine Manufacturing Company v. BorgWarner, Inc., No. 14-1059 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1059
Decided
June 10, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MODINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BORGWARNER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1059

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in No. 12-CV-00815, Judge J. P. Stadtmueller.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN H. MARGOLIES, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was KATHERINE W. SCHILL. Of counsel on the brief was DENNIS J. ABDELNOUR, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois. Of counsel was RACHEL N. FARRINGTON, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

RICHARD W. HOFFMANN, Reising Ethington P.C., of Troy, Michigan, argued for defendant-appellee. With him

2on the brief were MICHAEL J. DRUZINSKI, and E. COLIN CICOTTE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: ∗

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. ∗ Sharon Prost assumed the position of Chief Judge on May 31, 2014.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Modine Manufacturing Company v. BorgWarner, Inc., No. 14-1059 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01059-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01059-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.