Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Rudy v. Pato, No. 14-1056 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1056
Decided
April 11, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director, United States

Patent and Trademark Office, DEPUTY UNDERSECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND BARACK

OBAMA, in capacity as President of the United States or under color of the Office of President and

individually,

Defendants-Appellees.

2014-1056

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-00278-LMBTCB, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY, of Port Huron, Michigan, pro se.

2KIMERE J. KIMBALL, Special Assistant, United States Attorney, of Alexandria, Virginia, for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief were DANA J. BOENTE, Acting United States Attorney, and BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Special Assistant, United States Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were MONICA B. LATEEF and COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitors. Of counsel was NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor,

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Rudy v. Pato, No. 14-1056 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01056-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01056-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.