Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Home Gambling Network, Inc. v. Piche, No. 14-1053 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1053
Decided
June 9, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HOME GAMBLING NETWORK, INC., AND

MEL MOLNICK,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CHRISTOPHER PICHE, INVERSIONES VC DOS MIL S.A. (doing business as Casinoweb.com), AND

EYEBALL NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

MARGARET PICHE, INTERNET OPPORTUNITY

ENTERTAINMENT, ELECTRONIC FINANCIAL

SERVICES CARRIBEAN, INC., STARNET SYSTEMS

INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND WORLD GAMING

SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

2014-1053

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:05-cv-00610-DAE-VCF, Senior Judge David A. Ezra.

JUDGMENT

2SID LEACH, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., of Phoenix, Arizona, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

JACOB A. REYNOLDS, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, of Las Vegas, Nevada, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was PHILIP A. KANTOR, Philip A. Kantor, P.C., of Las Vegas, Nevada.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: ∗

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court ∗

Sharon Prost assumed the position of Chief Judge on May 31, 2014.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Home Gambling Network, Inc. v. Piche, No. 14-1053 (Fed. Cir. June 9, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01053-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01053-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.