Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Infection Prevention Tech v. Lumalier Corporation, No. 14-1038 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1038
Decided
June 20, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INFECTION PREVENTION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LUMALIER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

2014-1038

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:10-cv-12371-AC-LJM, Judge Avern Cohn.

JUDGMENT

MARC LORELLI, Brooks Kushman P.C., of Southfield, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was FRANK A. ANGILERI.

JOHN F. TRIGGS, Waddey & Patterson, P.C., of Nashville, Tennessee, argued for defendant-appellant. Of counsel was RYAN D. LEVY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 20, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Infection Prevention Tech v. Lumalier Corporation, No. 14-1038 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01038-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01038-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.