Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 14-1032 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1032
Decided
October 17, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG AND BAYER S.A.S.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1032

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00256-RMB-JS, Judge Renee Marie Bumb.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER J. GASPAR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT J. KOCH, STEPHANIE R. AMOROSO, EDWARD J. MAYLE and RONALD L. SIGWORTH, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were BRADFORD J. BADKE and SONA DE, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, New York.

MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With

2him on the brief were SUSANNAH LANDES WEAVER; and PETER A. BICKS, ALEX V. CHACHKES and ANDREW D. SILVERMAN, of New York, New York.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 14-1032 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01032-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01032-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.