Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Now Health Group, Inc., No. 14-1020 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1020
Also Docketed
No. 14-1033, No. 14-1039 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
October 8, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JARROW FORMULAS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NOW HEALTH GROUP, INC.,

doing business as Now Foods,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SOFT GEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant,

v.

JARROW FORMULAS, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.

2014-1020, -1033, -1039

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Nos. 2:10-cv-08301-PSG-JC and 2:11-cv-00164-PSG-JC, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez.

JUDGMENT

2MARK D. GIARRATANA and THOMAS J. RECHEN, McCarter & English, LLP, of Hartford, Connecticut, argued for Jarrow Formulas, Inc. With them on the brief were ERIC E. GRONDAHL and CHARLES D. RAY.

SRI K. SANKARAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellants, Soft Gel Technologies, Inc. With him on the brief for Soft Gel was DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN. On the brief for Now Health Group, Inc., were R. DAVID DONOGHUE and STEVEN E. JEDLINSKI, Holland & Knight LLP, of Chicago, Illinois.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED.1 See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. 1 Accordingly, the Motion to Strike filed by Jarrow Formulas, Inc. (ECF No. 57) is DENIED as moot.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Now Health Group, Inc., No. 14-1020 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01020-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01020-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.