Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Luv N' Care Ltd. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., No. 14-1007 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2014)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1007
Decided
December 11, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LUV N' CARE LTD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA

CORPORATION, AVENT LTD, AND KONINKLIJKE

PHILIPS N.V.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2014-1007

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:11-CV-00512-RSP, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne.

JUDGMENT

EDWARD DAVID MANZO, Husch Blackwell LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

FRANK A. DECOSTA, III, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were AARON L. PARKER and LILLIAN M. ROBINSON.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, PLAGER and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 11, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Luv N' Care Ltd. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V., No. 14-1007 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01007-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01007-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error