Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. eClinical Works, LLC, No. 14-1005 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1005
Decided
October 14, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., AND

UNILOC USA, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC, AND

PULSE SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2014-1005

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Nos. 2:13-cv-03244-MWF-PLA and 2:13-cv-03246-MWF-PLA, Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald.

JUDGMENT

LAWRENCE M. HADLEY, McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C., of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was ALAN P. BLOCK; and DANIEL L. GEYSER, of Dallas, Texas. Of counsel on the brief was JAMES L. ETHERIDGE, Etheridge Law Group, of Southlake, Texas.

2KEITH M. AURZADA, Bryan Cave LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for defendant-appellee, eClinical Works, LLC. With him on the brief was JOHN C. BUSH, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel on the brief was RYAN T. PUMPIAN, Bloom Sugarman Everett, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia.

DON V. KELLY, Evans & Dixon, LLC, of Saint Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee, Pulse Systems, Inc.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. eClinical Works, LLC, No. 14-1005 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-14-01005-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01005-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.