Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Otto Bock HealthCare LP v. Ossur Hf, No. 13-1650 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2014)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1650
Decided
February 14, 2014
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

February 21, 2014

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2013-1650 OTTO BOCK HEALTHCARE LP

v.

ÖSSUR HF AND ÖSSUR AMERICAS, INC.,

Decided: February 14, 2014 Nonprecedential Opinion

Page 5, line 3, “Otto Bock’s” has been changed to --Ossur’s--. Page 8, line 30, “Otto Bock’s” has been changed to --Ossur’s--.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Otto Bock HealthCare LP v. Ossur Hf, No. 13-1650 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-13-01650-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-13-01650-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.